Via HotAir:
Should the consequence of being provocative for a living be termination when getting something wrong or going over the line on occasion? I’d argue for no, even in the case of Jamie Stiehm, although that is a case that mightily tests this argument.
Stiehm has no problem explicitly stating her bigotry against “Rome,” as she refers to the Catholic Church, and in the piece in question implied that Catholics are unfit for public office as insufficiently independent of the Vatican (and therefore presumably insufficiently American).
