However this appears to have been totally refuted with the following peer-reviewed paper by reputable people published in a reputable peer reviewed journal:
“The 97.1 % consensus claimed by Cook et al. (2013) turns out upon inspection to be not 97.1 % but 0.3 %.
“Their claim of 97.1 % consensus, therefore, is arguably one of the greatest items of misinformation that has been circulated on either side of the climate debate.”
(via)
More from my site
Mark Steyn: ‘I generally make it a rule not to comment on publications for which I once wrote…’- Why is a sh*tty writer like John Miller ‘teaching’ ‘journalism’ at Ryerson?
- My blog gets more traffic than David Frum’s website (with update)
- If you’re sick to death of “At Last,” use this Mark Steyn essay as a defibrillator