BCF (whose homemade illustration makes it extra special):
Legal experts are calling it the “Sous-vêtements Rouges Gambit”. Giacomo Vigna’s red underpants were exposed in court during the Vigna v Levant libel trial opening new vistas in legal strategy. Is this tactic truly revolutionary in nature? Will it reshape the Canadian legal landscape? Were they conservative Stanfields as befits the dignity of the court or something a little more daring? How will it impact the Judges decision?
