BCF (whose homemade illustration makes it extra special):
Legal experts are calling it the “Sous-vêtements Rouges Gambit”. Giacomo Vigna’s red underpants were exposed in court during the Vigna v Levant libel trial opening new vistas in legal strategy. Is this tactic truly revolutionary in nature? Will it reshape the Canadian legal landscape? Were they conservative Stanfields as befits the dignity of the court or something a little more daring? How will it impact the Judges decision?
More from my site
NPR: ‘only one of the 23 on-air stories mentioned the name Mary Jo Kopechne…’- Will new Lenny Bruce/ free speech documentary freely use the words ‘Islam’ or ‘Muslims’?
- ‘In his frustration, he even invoked the name of the deity in which he does not believe…’
- More thoughts on the Moon Report on the Canadian Human Rights Commissions