No, “James E. Miller” is not me writing under a fake name.
When I wrote about this topic at Taki’s, I expect the comments were “well, you’re a stupid girl so you don’t GET it.” Not sure what they’ll say about him…
I hate “science.” Henry Ford said “History is bunk” but isn’t “science” mostly just b.s.? As long as somebody else understands how this crap works, fine. But “quantum physics” will probably turn out to be a giant Piltdown Man mental circle jerk caused by strained optic nerves…
Sure, the moon landing was an incredible feat demonstrating American strength at time of conflict with a competing superpower. But I’m in agreement with Gary North: It was the “most expensive PR stunt in American history,” with little other benefit. We have yet to put a man on another moon, let alone another planet. It’s been a half century since Neil Armstrong made history, and the federal government still fails at running a simple website.
The saccharine lengths some go to to express their admiration for NASA has always made me queasy. Like all government bureaucracies, it wastes an incredible amount of money. Yet conservative lawmakers like Ted Cruz never miss an opportunity to remind us that conquering new galaxies is paramount to our national survival. (…)
My antipathy for space travel goes hand in hand with my overall distaste for science worshipping. The celebrification of the study of the natural world has been as infantilizing and degrading as Richard Nixon’s clownish appearance on Rowan & Martin’s Laugh-In. “I fucking love science”? I’d much rather string celebrity science guy Neil deGrasse Tyson up by his thumbs.
I knit my brow at scientism because it contains all the repulsive qualities common to space enthusiasts like Seager: hubris, pride, and unwarranted confidence.
But, no one is actually asking, why do you watch Star Trek?
(Especially because I loathe life-wasting, masturbatory cosplay/video game playing/collecting crap aspect of the phenomenon. Yes, I love studying fandoms, but want nothing to do with Trekkers in meatspace…It’s an anthropological interest only.)
Well, because problem solving is my porn.
I like watching daring, clever, duty-bound (yet rule-breaking) competent men beat bad guys and fix shit.
(Having had a father and a step-father who were/did NONE of those things probably had something to do with it.)
If Star Trek was actually set on Antarctica (and here, it is) I would watch the hell out of that (and have.)
But I also love how this fictional universe (which I would HATE to live in because they’ve abolished money, wear ugly clothes, and pretend to believe in peace and love and shit) has inspired real world, well, enterprises.
Yes, space travel is stupid. But it’s amazing that a black woman decided she could and would become an astronaut because she saw an actress do it on her TV when she was a kid.
I totally get that, and just get off on the phenomenon of people taking a sliver of fiction, and having seen this fake, plastic, non-functional prop, worked to create a functional version (and a multi-billion dollar industry.)
It’s like cargo culting, except by, well, smart people with way more resources who actually want shit to work.
Star WARS on the other hand is just life-wasting masturbatory etc EXCLUSIVELY.
Star Wars is nothing but escapism.
It has had no real world impact except that negative one. Star Wars has been a net negative on society while Star Trek has been a net positive:
