There’s another major debate within the zoophile community over what Tom called “fence-hopping,” which is an innocuous way of saying “sneaking into someone else’s property and fucking their animals.” This is one of those slippery-slope moments for the folks who believe animals can consent to sex: “After all, if you believe animals can consent, why does the opinion of a third-party human matter?”
Plenty of zoophiles in that thread describe fence-hopping as “sadistic” and “rape,” and we’d like to point out that none of our sources endorsed this behavior, but it also has its defenders, and here’s how their arguments look:
“When one regards the animal as an independent individual, then why would an owner care about with whom his animal interacts with? Isn’t it so that the animal is mature enough to decide what he/she wants and with whom? Why would an owner — who keeps this honorable animal as slave — care? Keep your hands off my slave; it has to function and when it doesn’t, it will be beaten until it does!?”
