The U.S. Supreme Court Monday has declined to hear Elane Photography v. Willock, the case of a photographer who was told by the New Mexico Supreme Court that she must, as “the price of citizenship,” use her creative talents to communicate a message with which she disagrees or suffer punishment.
Nonetheless, Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys representing Elane Photography and its owners, Jonathan and Elaine Huguenin, point out that the central concern in the case—government punishment of Americans for declining to create or promote messages with which they disagree—is alive in other ADF cases moving forward around the country.
More from my site
David Warren: “Perhaps I wrote too soon…” (read the whole thing)- Misunderstanders of Islam: a handy partial list
- ‘Keep in mind, this woman wrote a book called How to Kill your Husband’
Actually, guys, the real reason Trump won was because America has stuff like “a Steinhardt clinical associate professor of educational theatre who specializes in ethnodrama”