Taxpayers have been subsidizing [farmer] Chuck Herrin’s underpayment of his illegal labor force for decades, with skyrocketing taxes to pay for schools, roads, bridges, food stamps, health care and so on. Now Herrin thinks “we” are supposed to support his illegal employees in their old age, too. (…)
“We” got hospital emergency rooms jammed with illegal aliens when we came in with heart attacks. “We” got the crime, drunk-driving and drug trafficking associated with illegal aliens. “We” got the overcrowded schools filled with kids whose illegal alien parents don’t pay property taxes. “We” got to press “one” for English.
This is even worse than the Wall Street bailouts — another example of fat cats pocketing 100 percent of the profits when business is good, but demanding a taxpayer handout when their investments go south. At least the Wall Street bailouts didn’t alter the country forever by giving the Democrats 30 million new voters.
Here’s something I’ve never heard anywhere:
At a big conservative confab, I spoke to a well-known right wing critic of American immigration policy. He told me that American businessmen quite simply prefer to hire Hispanics, because — yes, they are cheaper — but they are also harder working and have fewer “attitude problems” than the workers they’ve replaced, that is: African-Americans.
That’s what this expert told me. I don’t know it it’s true.
