Mark Steyn will be accepting apologies throughout the day…
Robert Spencer reports:
However, don’t expect the New York Times, which put me on its front page for this, or the Daily Mail or any of the other media outlets that blamed the counter-jihad movement for his murders to issue retractions and apologies, or to take any notice of this at all: this article is only in Swedish. No English-language outlets have picked it up at all. (…)
He says that he used “counter-jihadist” rhetoric in the manifesto to protect “ethno-nationalists” and instead provoke a media campaign against the anti-nationalist counter-jihad supporters. He calls this a strategy of “dual psychology.”
Further proof that Breivik was never a counter-jihadist comes from his recommendation that Europeans should make common cause with jihadists: “An alliance with the Jihadists might prove beneficial to both parties but will simply be too dangerous (and might prove to be ideologically counter-productive). We both share one common goal.” He even called for making common cause with Hamas in plotting jihad terror…
Warren Kinsella’s track record for accuracy and insight remains Michael Jordan-like!
