EyeOnACrazyPlanet contemplates media hypocrisy:
If personal foibles are so relevant, does this mean we should be exposing more of them?What about the married Canadian political party leader who frequented Gay bathhouses and tried to pick up underage boys? Many in the media know of that, but covered it up.
News media has a great deal of public influence, so does that mean their lives are part of the public interest?
Since so many of Rob Ford’s vindictive enemies claim that, ‘really, we just want him to get help,’ perhaps it would be helpful to expose which Toronto news anchorwoman worked as a call girl. After all, the trauma may be affecting her and the way she does her job still and I just want her to get help.
Or how about those married folk at The Toronto Star and Globe and Mail who are having affairs with their married colleagues, or the married CBC producers having affairs with their junior staffers?
Or what about some of the deviant sexual practices of some members of Toronto’s City Council and some of the MPPs at Queen’s Park? (…)
All this is to say nothing of the widespread past use of cocaine by many of those same people who are now falling over themselves to condemn Rob Ford for using what is in essence the same substance.
I guess we need to know who those people are too. I know people who were involved with them directly in those activities.
Is that now fair game?
I hope not, because these are games that no one should want to begin.
