• About Kathy Shaidle
  • Kathy Shaidle: Privacy policy

5 Feet of Fury

Kathy Shaidle's blog. Est. 2000

What I was trying to say when I disagreed with Ed Driscoll over Slate’s Woodward/Belushi piece

March 16, 2013 By Kathy Shaidle

Last week.

This guy:

Suppose I say, “Keith drove like a maniac” and you ask me why. We would usually explain the event in terms of value-laden concepts like intention, emotion, and so on—“Keith was really stressed out”—and this seems to work perfectly fine. Now we can also take the exact same event and describe it using an entirely different set of scientific concepts— say “there was a chain of electrochemical reactions from this brain to this foot” or “there was x pressure on the accelerator which caused y torque on the wheels.” These might be true descriptions, but they simply don’t give us the whole or even a marginally complete picture of Keith driving like a maniac. We could describe every single relevant physical detail of that event and still have no explanation. Nor, according to Putnam, should we expect there to be. The full scope of reality is simply too complex to be fully described by one method of explanation.

More from my site

  • “A Tribute to Sweet Gene Vincent”“A Tribute to Sweet Gene Vincent”
  • The Big Screen TVs of Turtle Island: my latest at Taki’sThe Big Screen TVs of Turtle Island: my latest at Taki’s
  • Ed Anger says, ‘Good riddance, Ted Kennedy!’Ed Anger says, ‘Good riddance, Ted Kennedy!’
  • Julie Burchill: ‘People aren’t voting for Ukip because they’re ignorant or stupid or haven’t got it’Julie Burchill: ‘People aren’t voting for Ukip because they’re ignorant or stupid or haven’t got it’

Filed Under: conservative blog

« From ‘crime’ to ‘illness’ to ‘lifestyle’
Ashley Judd was asking for it »

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in