Mark Steyn comments on the latest Euro-trash appeasement Twister move — the conviction of Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff for saying “Mohammed was pedophile”:
So, although Mohammed deflowered Aisha when she was nine, it is “factually incorrect” to call him a pedophile because he was still hot for her when she was in her late teens? As a point of law, it’s not where you start, it’s where you finish – and you’re gonna finish on top! Does this judicial ruling apply to all Austrians partial to a piece of underage totty? For example, Wolfgang Priklopil:
“The Austrian girl who was kidnapped at the age of ten and imprisoned for eight years in a dungeon-like basement room by a pedophile predator who committed suicide when she escaped last week…”
Whoa, whoa, hold up there. How can you say Herr Priklopil was a “pedophile” when he was still having sex with her when she was 18? And so were all his friends…
During my difficulties with the “human rights” regime in Canada, Kathy Shaidle liked to taunt the state enforcers with the line “You’re not smart enough to tell me how to live.” They’re certainly too stupid to tell us what to think. Yet, in torturing logic and law and liberty in ever more inane ways, judges and prosecutors send a consistent message that makes perfect sense to Islamic imperialists — that Islam is hedged off from the norms of intellectual scrutiny that apply to any other ideology, and that in recognition of that privileged protection judges, prosecutors and governments are happy to toss core western values overboard.
This is a disgraceful decision. Elisabeth is appealing it, and she deserves your full support.