In Irshad Manji’s book The Trouble With Islam, she blames a random group of desert fanatics for hijacking Muslim culture and taking it from an intellectual religion of peace to a closed-minded religion of war. Her hypothesis is pretty solid, but you can’t help thinking, “Why was their religion so hijackable in the first place?”
Could Kentucky’s snake-handlers ever convince the rest of America to give a shit about Mark 16’s “They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them” passage?
Controversial Danish psychologist Nicolai Sennels has a much less groovy explanation: inbreeding. In this (poorly translated) article, Sennels reveals years of research that shows Muslims have been marrying first cousins, like, A LOT. And as we all know from retarded Pharaohs, hideous British monarchs, and curiously violent hillbillies, this practice is bad for more than your teeth. Inbreds tend to be stupider, more violent, less rational, and less likely to evolve.
Ring any bells?
Though it’s still the left’s favorite comedy target, you don’t really see that many yokels walking around Appalachia barefoot with a shotgun hoping a feuding neighbor doesn’t pop out from that holler over yonder. But the Muslim world is filled with shoeless, toothless, inbred, hill-dwelling, rifle-toting, sodomy-prone men ready to kill for a God they’ve never seen.
They even have their own Hatfields and McCoys: They’re called Sunnis and Shiites. (…)
Though Pakistanis comprise a mere 3.4% of Britain’s overall births, they “produce an alarming 30% of the UK’s genetically diseased children.”
More from my site
