On any objective reading of Whatcott’s flyers, he did ridicule and belittle gays — and he probably even exposed them to hatred.
What rankles free-speechers is the more fundamental question:
Why should this be against the law?
On any objective reading of Whatcott’s flyers, he did ridicule and belittle gays — and he probably even exposed them to hatred.
What rankles free-speechers is the more fundamental question:
Why should this be against the law?