Generally, I thought it went really well. But the normally razor sharp Steve Paikin seemed confused at one point.
Ezra was the accused, not the complainant, so “being Ezra Levant” helped him win against a “nobody” who was using a system specifically designed to help “nobodies.” In other words: the avenue of recourse that Paikin seemed to suggest was necessary to “help” the “little guy” already exists. And it’s ****ed.
