Interfaith dialogue is for suckers:
Here is a stunningly frank account — by a Muslim, in a stridently pro-Islamic paper — of Islamic scholars’ changing their answers on religious questions based on whether the question is presented publicly or privately. That a supposed moral “truth” can depend upon the audience speaks volumes about the pitfalls of “interfaith dialogue,” and ultimately confirms something we have seen time and time again from Islamic apologists.
And you won’t be at all surprised to learn that the lying Muslim has now filed a lawsuit against the truthful Muslim who dared to publish his embarrassing lies.
