“Given that the law students of Law Is Cool support a ‘human rights’ system that prosecutes you for blog comments, it is worth noting that its anonymous editors rewrite blog comments…”
Hmmm, have the Law Is Cool liars and cowards been in touch with Richard Warman? That’s his M.O., too…
“What is to stop the law students of Law Is Cool editing Mr Reese’s comment to appear ‘racist’ and then reporting him to the Human Rights Commission? Unlike the larky lads at Law Is Cool, I’m no lawyer, but I wonder if, in rewriting him to alter the clear meaning of what he says, Law Is Cool has not breached Mr Reese’s ‘human rights’? If no apology and clarification is forthcoming, perhaps a complaint to the CHRC is in order.
(…)
“UPDATE: By the way, I was tickled by this from the Law Is Cool nellies:
“‘Steyn’s armies of Conservative bloggers have proved themselves a volatile bunch. Time for this site to move on…‘
“Ah, I see. At Law Is Cool, the statute of limitations kicks in after 24 hours: Time to move on, people to see, blogs to run. But it’s different when Daniel Simard demands his own Maclean’s cover story in response to one six months earlier. If Law Is Cool is indicative of his nimbleness, I may do the cross-examination myself.”
So note: if you’re a soldier in “Steyn’s army” and left a comment at Law Is Cool defending him, check to see if they’ve altered your comment and let me know at kshaidle – AT – rogers.com.
We knew they were illiterate, arrogant twits over at Law Is Cool.
Now we know they’re dishonest, too.
More from my site
